Dallas wrote:I'm sorry TRA, but you are making a fallacious argument here:
"Slut" is a rather subjective sexual state of being.
"Rapist" is a clear-cut perpetrator of a sexual crime.
"Acting" a part.....is far more serious than "dressing" it.
See what you've done?
You brought out the Angry Feminist in me.
Fallacious and delicious. Seriously, this is the same anger when I go to a bar. See, there's always a girl at the bar with a dress so short that you can see is the carpet matches the drapes, a neckline that plunges deeper than Jacques Cousteau, and more makeup than Tammy Fae Bakker. So one might see this fine specimen and say to one self, "Boy, she's trolling with the steel net tonight." So one might wander over and attempt to strike up a conversation, to which one receives the response "I don't want to talk to anyone tonight. I just need some me time."
fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK!
You could have stayed at home dressed all normal like and not talked to anyone. And had your fucking me time. But no, you had to come out here looking all pr0n and fuck with my reptilian brain.
But according to your argument, I can go out on the street dressed as a Police Officer, and when someone runs up to me begging for help I an kindly brush them off explaining, "No, I'm just dressed the part, I'm not acting it" and that's okay?
Fucking double standard.